Bluetooth Low Energy vs. Classic Bluetooth

by Rolf Nilsson and Bill Saltzstein

Bluetooth low energy technology isn’t just another Bluetooth revision—it’s a whole new technology.

With the introduction of Bluetooth low energy technology, there has been considerable interest in its possibilities in both the media and the market.Bluetooth low energy technology also has important limitations as well as benefits. It is quite different from Classic Bluetooth technology—so different that one carefully needs to consider which technology best fits the application needs.

Bluetooth technology was originally designed for continuous, streaming data applications including voice and has successfully eliminated wires in many consumer as well as industrial and medical applications. Classic Bluetooth technology will continue to provide a robust wireless connection between devices ranging from headsets and cars to industrial controllers and streaming medical sensors. Many of these connections are not good candidates for the new Bluetooth low energy technology, but many other new applications will be.

Bluetooth low energy technology was introduced in 2011, through the Bluetooth Specification v4.0 (Bluetooth v4.0). With its extremely low power consumption, unique characteristics, and new features, Bluetooth low energy technology enables new applications that were not practical with Classic Bluetooth technology. Coin cell battery-operated sensors and actuators in medical, industrial, consumer, and fitness applications (also known as “Smart”) can now smoothly connect to Bluetooth low energy technology–enabled smart phones, tablets, or gateways (also known as “Smart Ready”). Bluetooth low energy technology is ideal for applications requiring episodic or periodic transfer of small amounts of data.

Extremely Low Power Consumption

The key feature of Bluetooth low energy technology is its low power consumption that makes it possible to power a small device with a tiny coin cell battery—such as a CR2032 battery—for 5–10 years.

As with Classic Bluetooth technology, Bluetooth low energy technology operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM band and has similar radio frequency (RF) output power; however, because a Bluetooth low energy device is in sleep mode most of the time and only wakes up when a connection is initiated, the power consumption can be kept to a minimum. Power consumption is kept low because the actual connection times are of only a few mS. The maximum, or peak, power consumption is only 15 mA, and the average power consumption is of only about 1 µA.

Strong, Common Features

Many features of Classic Bluetooth technology are inherited in Bluetooth low energy technology, including adaptive frequency hopping (AFH) as well as part of the logical link control and adaptation protocol (L2CAP) interface.

Bluetooth low energy technology also implements the same link security with simple pairing modes, secure authentication, and encryption.

This inheritance makes Bluetooth low energy technology easy to set up, robust, and reliable in tough environments.

Limitations

The use of low power consumption and coin cell battery operation also has its limitations. Data transfer rates with Classic Bluetooth technology using enhanced data rate (Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR) can exceed 2 Mb/s (actual payload), but practical transfer rates for Bluetooth low energy technology are below 100 kb/s (actual payload of roughly 1/20). Therefore, streaming Bluetooth low energy connections will lose a great deal of the huge potential power savings as the utilization approaches continuous transmission.

In other words, some applications are better served with a Bluetooth low energy connection than others. The use varies depending on the type of device a sensor is connected to.

Differences in Bluetooth Profile Support

The behavior of a Bluetooth connection—whether Classic or low energy—is determined by the Bluetooth profiles a device has implemented. Devices can only connect if they both have the same Bluetooth profile implemented, and there are some important differences between what profiles are available for Classic Bluetooth technology and for Bluetooth low energy technology.

A good example of the differences is seen in serial port emulation. Classic Bluetooth technology provides the serial port profile (SPP) for emulation of serial data connections. Bluetooth low energy technology provides no such support in the standard Specification v4.0; although suppliers like connectBlue can provide a good level of support.

Many other profiles are not offered for Bluetooth low energy technology because of the differences in the connection models. The Classic Bluetooth scenarios that are not part of Bluetooth low energy technology include headset (HSP), object exchange (OBEX), audio distribution (A2DP), video distribution (VDP), and file transfer (FTP).

Bluetooth Low Energy Technology is Completely New

In several key aspects, Bluetooth low energy technology is a totally new technology. For instance, the technology features very efficient discovery and connection set-up, short data packages, and asymmetric design for small devices.

As with Classic Bluetooth technology, Bluetooth low energy technology is based on a master connected to a number of slaves. However, in Bluetooth low energy technology the number of slaves can be very large; how large depends on the implementation and available memory. The new advertising functionality makes it possible for a slave to announce that it has something to transmit to other devices that are scanning. Advertising messages can also include an event or a measurement value.

There are also differences in software structure. In Bluetooth low energy technology all parameters have a state that is accessed using the attribute protocol. Attributes are represented as characteristics that describe signal value, presentation format, client configuration, etc. The definitions of these attributes and characteristics along with their use make it possible to build numerous basic services and profiles like proximity, battery, automation I/O, building automation, lighting, fitness, and medical devices. All these nuances are needed to make the implementation seamless and compatible between devices from different manufacturers.

Single-Mode and Dual-Mode—What Does That Mean?

Because the two technologies are fundamentally different, there are the two following options for implementations:

• Single-mode Devices. These devices are stand-alone Bluetooth low energy devices (also known as “Smart” devices) optimized for small battery-operated devices with low cost and low power consumption in focus. A typical single-mode device is a heart rate sensor
• Dual-mode Devices. These devices (also known as “Smart Ready” devices) include both Bluetooth low energy technology and Classic Bluetooth technology. Dual-mode devices will rarely gain in power saving because they need to support both technology implementations; the power savings will only be achieved with the single-mode option. A typical dual-mode device is a mobile phone or PC.

Conclusion

In other words, even if both technologies have a common name in “Bluetooth,” it is important to understand that the addition of Bluetooth low energy technology is not the same thing as when new versions of the Bluetooth Specification have been released in the past. For some applications, Classic” is the best choice, and for others low energy is the best choice. Bluetooth low energy technology does not replace Classic Bluetooth technology—it is a whole new game.

Rolf Nilsson is the CEO and founder of connectBlue. He has more than 30 years of thorough insight and know-how from industrial automation and communication. Before founding connectBlue, Nilsson was the president of Eurotherm Scandinavia, and before that he was in leading positions at Alfa Laval Automation/ABB Automation Products.

Bill Saltzstein is the president of connectBlue Inc. as well as the medical business development manager, with more than 25 years of experience in medical device development and wireless technology. Prior to joining connectBlue, Saltzstein worked as a wireless medical expert through his own company, Code Blue Communications, and served in product management and development positions at Medtronic Physio-Control, Instromedix, and Hewlett-Packard.

Link: http://www.medicalelectronicsdesign.com/article/bluetooth-low-energy-vs-classic-bluetooth-choose-best-wireless-technology-your-application